The fable of c2
A powerful story...
In early 1999, after the Model C1 but before the D2 came this model. The SC-3--the
device to the left--used to reflect the C2's transmission beam as well as transmitted
the composite waveforms of the D2. Here are some more detailed pictures of the C2
device.
My reading and understanding of the Model 'C' experiments led to the construction
of the Model C2-137 Nonlinear Oscillator in March. The Model C2 was very similar
in design to the C with enhancements to the magnetic coupling systems. It's operational
behavior was this: a signal was input by an external generating device, such as
a sine wave generator whose linearity was known. The signal was shaped by a series
of inductors, resistors, and capacitors and projected into a set of two pairs of
magnets. The internal pair were placed across a nonconductive plate of clear plastic
and mounted with their fields attractive; the second pair were substantially larger
than the inner set and mounted with their fields opposing. This caused a greater
magnitude of vibration that the C had demonstrated; when photons were introduced
into the core of the C2--the magnets were flat spheres with a defined hole in them--they
absorbed the charge in the core and the device projected a beam of energy consisting
of plasmons or charged particles unlike the assemblage of the ones first introduced
to the core. The results was a projected beam of polarized light "sewn" with electron-positron
pairs which created the plasmonic state that could be seen with the naked eye. The
beam behaved similar to the laser that was the source of photons; the beam could
not be necessarily seen from the side (unless the absorption rate of the e-p pairs
were shifted by altering the frequency on the signal generator) but was clearly
visible to a detector placed in the path of the beam. I achieved beam saturation
at a frequency of 11.75GHz but discovered the C2 was prone to internal wear. After
a number of experiments, I had to raise the frequency and power of the external
generator until the necessary saturation potential moved beyond the capabilities
of the device. I conducted about 35 successful experiments with the Model C2-137
between May and November 1999 before it wore out entirely.
The analysis of the data told me my thinking was exactly correct but there was a
lot more than was unbeknownst to me about the nature of particles in the universe;
many of the conclusions I reached then are still a mystery to me now. They need
to be explored further but suffice to say it was a rather easy thing to strip an
object, a particle, of its time vector and plunge it into a configuration not alien
to it. But that reality of a particle can be easily changed if the time vector
is removed from its propagation.